Thursday 17th of December.

In our CRaM session today we finally managed to do all our filming and actually produce something worth watching, unlike last time.
After break we went to my Nans house which is about 3 minutes away from Coleridge and began filming. This time there were less people [ the people in our group] as this way there would be less distractions and messing about.
We worked very well together as a team and got some excellent footage. Filming at my nans house was definitely much easier and safer than the Cambridge Leisure Centre, we didn't have to worry about things like theft, rain, or filming on a private property without permission. Even though we managed to get some footage last time it didn't fit together well and didn't make sense at all.
It was completely clear to us that we had to film it all again with a completely different story, especially after we showed our Rough Edit to another CRaM student and had very negative feedback. So this is why we decided to re-film at my Nans house. This time everything fit together perfectly and it was much easier to film. However we had some problems with the sound, so we rang Mr. Durran and he told us what we had to do to overcome this difficulty. After we solved this problem, everything else was perfect, and it only needed editing. When we got back to Coleridge it was Lunch time so after our break we started editing immediately. After about 10 minutes of editing, We showed our rough edit to Mr.Durran and he had very positive feedback about our footage. We've edited most of it now and we are just putting a Royalty Free soundtrack onto it.

We haven't had any other problems with our footage yet, and hopefully there wont be any more. It was quite difficult having to abandon a plan, which we had written story boards, scripts, summaries, Risk assessments and more, We had even scouted the location. So it wasn't the easiest thing to do to change plans one week before the Christmas holidays, However we were successful and managed to produce something even better than I expected. Even though we completely failed with our other plan, I think it was quite a good experience and that I learned a lot from it.

I helped with a lot of the planning today, I wrote about the Location, I was also one of the characters in the film, and it was at my nans house. I'm very happy with our work today and I think we worked very well.

Thursday 10th of December.

In our CRaM class on Thursday our group decided that we would be filming on that day rather than the next day. So after we made our decision we went to Cineworld to do our filming. After the long walk there we began filming, this was quite difficult at the time as we were a big group of people and most of the people weren't cooperating, and everything was taking too much time. After about half an hour or so, one of the security guards had told us to leave as our location was a private property and we weren't allowed to film there.


We had already filmed most of what we needed, only one last bit was left and we could do that in Coleridge. After we filmed our last scene at Coleridge, we uploaded everything to the computer and edited it all roughly. After we watched it a few times and got others opinions on it, we realized that all our footage was completely useless and didn't make the least bit of sense.
This definitely brought all our moods down, and now we were behind everyone else, as most people had finished filming and some even editing. So in the last few lessons on Thursday we talked about the alternatives, after a discussion about what we were going to do instead we decided that it would be good to film at my grandmas house, as it was convenient and only across the road from school. After my Grandma agreed to us filming there, we quickly decided what we would change from our previous script, and how the story would be different.
Even though we haven't achieved anything in this lesson, or made anything useful, I think that it was a good experience even if it was a complete failure. I think I learnt quite a few things this lesson. Next week we will be much more prepared and will have costumes, and wont have to worry about walking far away. There wont be as many risks either, while outside there are many different things which could happen. Someone stealing the camera, Rain, being on private property without permission etc.
So even if we didn't manage to produce anything useful in this lesson, I think we still learnt useful things.

Thursday, 3rd of December.

In our CRaM session today, we went and scouted the location of where we would be filming and took some images. We went to the Cambridge Leisure centre, which is the location. It was pouring it down with rain and we got completely soaked, however we managed to overcome this obstacle. We got the pictures we needed for our folders and it simplified things. Now we have the pictures its much easier to make plans about how we are going to film certain shots and scenes.

We took about 8 pictures, showing the location of each shot we are going to take. This lets us take our plans further and on the day of the filming it will be much easier for us now we have these pictures.

When we got back to school we printed out the images and wrote which spot would be for what shot. This defiantly simplifies things for us as a group, as now we know exactly where we are going to be filming each scene.

I have worked independently today too.I took the images on my phone, in the rain.

We had some other difficulties today, other than the rain. The camera we had taken to take the pictures with wasn't working. So we had to take our images with my mobile phone.

Personally I believe today has been very successful, useful, and helpful to us. We got the images we needed, it helps us with the plans we are making and we will be able to refer to these images at any time if we forget something.

Here are some of the pictures we took today.

Research Report.

Public Information Films

Public information films began in 1946, sometime in march. I did some research on the Internet to try and find out more information about public information films. Here is an article from BBC from almost 4 years previous, when they were celebrating their 60th anniversary. The article does provide some information about Public information films, however it wasn't exactly what i was looking for. Here is the link to the article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4669540.stm

I also checked wikipedia to see if I could find anything, it provided more information than the BBC article did, but it didn't mention anything about who made them or how they began.Here is the link to it:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_information_film

I also checked the National Archives website, which provided similar information to the BBC article and wikipedia. But the national archives website is probably the most accurate and reliable of them all. It tells us about the COI [Central Office of Information], it says when it was established and how. It mentions their sixtieth anniversary too. Here is the link to the article:http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/FILMS/aboutfilms.htm

From the PIF's [Public Information Films] I have watched they have changed drastically over the years. They have changed in every way, the way the characters behave in the films, the quality of it of course, colour, style, and in the earlier years it was normally men who were made superior to women, however now it can be either or.

In the earlier years it was normally men who were starring in the films and if women were in fact involved it was normally suggesting that they shouldn't do something in a certain way, or they were doing something wrong. Back then the people in the films put on accents of a slightly posher voice and somehow superior and fatherly, however as the years passed by these accents disappeared and more women were in the films.

This video shows quite a few of the scarier PIF's from the 1970's. As you can see everyone is putting on a posher accent and in one of the videos it suggests that women cannot drive as well as men can. I think that some of the films are actually quite frightening like the one when the boy falls into the river and the scary man whose face you cant see, also the video of when the young boy goes into the substation because he lost his Frisbee in there. PIF's have certainly changed since then, here is an example of a newer PIF from the 2000s

as you can see this is very different to a one from the 70's. There isn't anyone putting on posh accents, and there is a woman speaking. The effects are also a lot better as it is 30 years later, so the quality, sound and effects would be better. I think the newer ones are shorter and more to the point than the older ones are. There isn't really any acting in this film so I can't compare to acting in the films from the 70's.Here is another recent PIF, this one has acting in it so I can compare this to one from the 70s. The acting in the more recent PIFs is more realistic and they're easier to relate to in my opinion, People who have depression will be able to relate to this video and it will convince to get help.

PIF's have changed a lot since they were made in the 40's, back then the people who were talking in them were acting quite paternalistic and the acting wasn't as naturalistic as it is now, they could even be patronizing. As the years went by the acting became more and more naturalistic and the people acting in it were less patronizing and of course the quality of the films improved too. If they made a film now like they did in the 40's, especially if they were being patronizing, people wouldn't even want to watch the film and would probably be quite shocked and insulted in my opinion. Back then the people in the film used to talk to people as they were dumb and didn't know anything.

Here are two warning films somehow based on the same thing. The first one is from the early 2000's when mobile phones we're a new thing and texting was a big deal to people. Both films are about road safety however they are quite different. The first film is quite dramatic and you can tell that the people who made it went to a lot of trouble to make it, there are many different camera angles and the acting is not very naturalistic unlike the second film. Some people in our CRaM class thought that the second one was real and it had just been caught on camera! Another thing which makes the second film more convincing is that it has been filmed with a camera phone. It is also something other teenagers could relate to. Hanging around on the streets, messing around and then crossing the road without looking properly, it could really happen to anyone. You can tell that the first film is older because of the phones in the film too, they look very old and simple and it looks like texting is a new thing to them. It is quite obvious that a lot of effort has been put into the first film, it has been edited perfectly and there are many different good camera angles. The acting is very good too, different to the second film though. The music also adds to the effect of the first film, it stays the same volume and pace throughout the whole film, even when the boy gets hit by the car, normally I would have thought that wouldn't work very well, but it did in this film, it adds to the whole effect of it. The second film is quite scary in my opinion as it looks like it could be real and its something people can relate to, the acting in it is very naturalistic too.